A literature review isn't a list of summaries. It's an argument about the state of knowledge on your topic — what's known, what's contested, and where the gaps are. Done well, it sets up your own research as the obvious next step. Here's how to build one.
Before you read anything, narrow your scope. "Social media and mental health" is a book; "the link between Instagram use and body image in teenage girls" is a literature review. A tight question keeps your search manageable and your review coherent.
Use your library databases, Google Scholar and subject-specific indexes. Keep a record of your search terms and which databases you used — you may need to describe your method. For each promising source, save the citation immediately so you don't lose it later.
This is the step that separates a strong review from a weak one. Do not write "Smith (2019) found… Then Jones (2020) found…" paragraph after paragraph. Instead, group sources by the themes, debates or methods they share, and write a section on each theme that brings multiple sources into conversation.
The unit of a literature review is the idea, not the paper.
Within each theme, show how studies agree, disagree, build on or contradict each other. Phrases like "Consistent with X, several studies report…" or "In contrast, Y argues…" signal synthesis. Point out patterns, methodological differences and unresolved tensions.
End by naming what the literature hasn't yet answered — the gap your own work will address. This is the bridge from your review to your research question, and examiners look for it directly.
It's one of the most time-consuming parts of any dissertation. Our academics do this for a living — see our dissertation support or get study support.
Tell us your topic and we'll prepare a model literature review for you to study from.
Get Study Support